plm tries to follow as close as possible the way models are
fitted using lm
. This relies on the following steps, using
the formula
-data
with some modifications:
model.frame
by getting the
relevant arguments (formula
, data
,
subset
, weights
, na.action
and
offset
) and the supplementary argument,model.frame
the response
y
(with pmodel.response
) and the model matrix
X
(with model.matrix
),plm.fit
with X
and y
as arguments.Panel data has a special structure which is described by an
index
argument. This argument can be used in the
pdata.frame
function which returns a
pdata.frame
object. A pdata.frame
can be used
as input to the data
argument of plm
. If the
data
argument of plm
is an ordinary
data.frame
, the index
argument can also be
supplied as an argument of plm
. In this case, the
pdata.frame
function is called internally to transform the
data.
Next, the formula
, which is the first and mandatory
argument of plm
is coerced to a Formula
object.
model.frame
is then called, but with the
data
argument in the first position (a
pdata.frame
object) and the formula
in the
second position. This unusual order of the arguments enables to use a
specific model.frame.pdata.frame
method defined in
plm
.
As for the model.frame.formula
method, a
data.frame
is returned, with a terms
attribute.
Next, the X
matrix is extracted using
model.matrix
. The usual way to do so is to feed the
function with two arguments, a formula
or a
terms
object and a data.frame
created with
model.frame
. lm
uses something like
model.matrix(terms(mf), mf)
where mf
is a
data.frame
created with model.frame
.
Therefore, model.matrix
needs actually one argument and not
two and we therefore wrote a model.matrix.pdata.frame
which
does the job ; the method first checks that the argument has a
term
attribute, extracts the terms
(actually
the formula
) and then computes the model’s matrix
X
.
The response y
is usually extracted using
model.response
, with a data.frame
created with
model.frame
as first argument, but it is not generic. We
therefore created a generic called pmodel.response
and
provide a pmodel.response.pdata.frame
method. We illustrate
these features using a simplified (in terms of covariates) example with
the SeatBelt
data set:
library("plm")
data("SeatBelt", package = "pder")
SeatBelt$occfat <- with(SeatBelt, log(farsocc / (vmtrural + vmturban)))
pSB <- pdata.frame(SeatBelt)
We start with an OLS (pooling) specification:
formols <- occfat ~ log(usage) + log(percapin)
mfols <- model.frame(pSB, formols)
Xols <- model.matrix(mfols)
y <- pmodel.response(mfols)
coef(lm.fit(Xols, y))
## (Intercept) log(usage) log(percapin)
## 7.4193570 0.1657293 -1.1583712
which is equivalent to:
## (Intercept) log(usage) log(percapin)
## 7.4193570 0.1657293 -1.1583712
Next, we use an instrumental variables specification. Variable
usage
is endogenous and instrumented by three variables
indicating the law context: ds
, dp
, and
dsp
.
The model is described using a two-parts formula, the first part of the RHS describing the covariates and the second part the instruments. The following two formulations can be used:
formiv1 <- occfat ~ log(usage) + log(percapin) | log(percapin) + ds + dp + dsp
formiv2 <- occfat ~ log(usage) + log(percapin) | . - log(usage) + ds + dp + dsp
The second formulation has two advantages:
-
sign in the second RHS part of the formula.The formula is coerced to a Formula
, using the
Formula
package. model.matrix.pdata.frame
then
internally calls model.matrix.Formula
in order to extract
the covariates and instruments model matrices:
mfSB1 <- model.frame(pSB, formiv1)
X1 <- model.matrix(mfSB1, rhs = 1)
W1 <- model.matrix(mfSB1, rhs = 2)
head(X1, 3) ; head(W1, 3)
## (Intercept) log(usage) log(percapin)
## 8 1 -0.7985077 9.955748
## 9 1 -0.4155154 9.975622
## 10 1 -0.4155154 10.002110
## (Intercept) log(percapin) ds dp dsp
## 8 1 9.955748 0 0 0
## 9 1 9.975622 1 0 0
## 10 1 10.002110 1 0 0
For the second (and preferred formulation), the dot
argument should be set and is passed to the Formula
methods. .
has actually two meanings:
which correspond respectively to dot = "seperate"
(the
default) and dot = "previous"
. See the difference between
the following two examples:
## occfat log(usage) log(percapin) state year farsocc farsnocc usage
## 8 -3.788976 -0.7985077 9.955748 AK 1990 90 8 0.45
## 9 -3.904837 -0.4155154 9.975622 AK 1991 81 20 0.66
## 10 -3.699611 -0.4155154 10.002110 AK 1992 95 13 0.66
## percapin unemp meanage precentb precenth densurb densrur
## 8 21073 7.05 29.58628 0.04157167 0.03252657 1.099419 0.1906836
## 9 21496 8.75 29.82771 0.04077293 0.03280357 1.114670 0.1906712
## 10 22073 9.24 30.21070 0.04192957 0.03331731 1.114078 0.1672785
## viopcap proppcap vmtrural vmturban fueltax lim65 lim70p mlda21 bac08
## 8 0.0009482704 0.008367458 2276 1703 8 0 0 1 0
## 9 0.0010787370 0.008940661 2281 1740 8 0 0 1 0
## 10 0.0011257068 0.008366873 2005 1836 8 1 0 1 0
## ds dp dsp
## 8 0 0 0
## 9 1 0 0
## 10 1 0 0
## occfat log(usage) log(percapin) ds dp dsp
## 8 -3.788976 -0.7985077 9.955748 0 0 0
## 9 -3.904837 -0.4155154 9.975622 1 0 0
## 10 -3.699611 -0.4155154 10.002110 1 0 0
In the first case, all the covariates are returned by
model.frame
as the .
is understood by default
as “everything”.
In plm
, the dot
argument is internally set
to previous
so that the end-user doesn’t have to worry
about these subtleties.
mfSB2 <- model.frame(pSB, formiv2)
X2 <- model.matrix(mfSB2, rhs = 1)
W2 <- model.matrix(mfSB2, rhs = 2)
head(X2, 3) ; head(W2, 3)
## (Intercept) log(usage) log(percapin)
## 8 1 -0.7985077 9.955748
## 9 1 -0.4155154 9.975622
## 10 1 -0.4155154 10.002110
## (Intercept) log(percapin) ds dp dsp
## 8 1 9.955748 0 0 0
## 9 1 9.975622 1 0 0
## 10 1 10.002110 1 0 0
The IV estimator can then be obtained as a 2SLS estimator: First, regress the covariates on the instruments and get the fitted values:
## (Intercept) log(usage) log(percapin)
## 8 1 -1.0224257 9.955748
## 9 1 -0.5435055 9.975622
## 10 1 -0.5213364 10.002110
Next, regress the response on these fitted values:
## (Intercept) log(usage) log(percapin)
## 7.5641209 0.1768576 -1.1722590
The same can be achieved in one command by using the
formula
-data
interface with
plm
:
## (Intercept) log(usage) log(percapin)
## 7.5641209 0.1768576 -1.1722590
or with the ivreg
function from package AER
(or with the newer function ivreg
in package
ivreg
superseding AER::ivreg()
):
## (Intercept) log(usage) log(percapin)
## 7.5641209 0.1768576 -1.1722590